How increasing perceived security on a primary donation page for mobile devices can impact donor conversion Experiment ID: #13030
Billy Graham Evangelistic Association
Timeframe: 2/26/2019 - 3/26/2019
One of the most common reasons web visitors don’t complete transactions online is a perceived lack of security. Knowing this, Billy Graham Evangelical Association wondered if their primary donation pathway was losing potential donors because it didn’t visually represent how secure it was. They created a special security box around the credit card section of form and added a padlock into the shaded box to represent that the form was secure. This didn’t make the form more secure—it was already PCI compliant and had the highest levels of security. All these design tweaks did was increase perception of security with the end user. They launched an A/B test on all device types (desktop/mobile/tablet) to see if it increased donor conversion as they hypothesized.
Will adding visual elements increase the perception of form security increase donor conversion on mobile devices?
|Treatment Name||Conv. Rate||Relative Difference||Confidence|
This experiment has a required sample size of 431 in order to be valid. Since the experiment had a total sample size of 4,609, and the level of confidence is above 95% the experiment results are valid.
Flux Metrics Affected
The Flux Metrics analyze the three primary metrics that affect revenue (traffic, conversion rate, and average gift). This experiment produced the following results:
0% increase in traffic
× 16.3% decrease in conversion rate
× 0% increase in average gift
Adding visual elements to increase the perception of security on the donation form decreased donor conversion by 16% on mobile devices. We hypothesize that this decrease could be in the way that the visual elements look on mobile. Instead of reducing friction for the donor pathway on mobile devices, the visual security elements may have actually increased this by making the credit card section stand out from the rest of the elements on the form, drawing attention to it being called out.
Even though we saw a 16% decrease in donor conversion on mobile devices, we saw a 20% increase in donor conversion on desktop devices. While it is important to look at the impact on all devices, it is important to know that the majority of donations and revenue (67%) on the primary donation page comes from desktop devices. Because the revenue impact is so much greater on desktop than on other devices, we recommend rolling out this tactic on desktop to continue to increase donations and revenue, while no longer featuring the tactic on mobile to eliminate the negative impact.