How a more empathetic messaging approach in an email solicitation can affect response rate Experiment ID: #616

The Heritage Foundation

Founded in 1973, The Heritage Foundation is a research and educational institution—a think tank—whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense.

Experiment Summary

Timeframe: 12/29/2014 - 12/30/2014

With a little over two days left before the end of the year, Heritage Foundation email subscribers had received six different messages from Jim DeMint– the president of the organization– asking for their support with a year-end gift. Best practices suggest that the email signer should be the most publicly know leader of the organization, and should rarely (if ever) change to ensure donors hear a consistent voice. Heritage tested that theory by sending an email from someone else in the organization.

Research Question

How does a softer, more empathetic tone from a more believable email sender affect email response rate?

MECLABS Conversion Factors Targeted

C = 4m + 3v + 2( i - f) - 2a ©

Copyright 2015, MECLABS

Design

C: Jim Demint Sender
T1: New Signer

Results

Treatment Name Revenue per Visitor Relative Difference Confidence Average Gift
C: Jim Demint Sender $0.03 $66.18
T1: New Signer $0.14 380.7% 99.9% $134.70

This experiment has a required sample size of 111,364 in order to be valid. Since the experiment had a total sample size of 169,910, and the level of confidence is above 95%, the experiment results are valid.

Flux Metrics Affected

The Flux Metrics analyze the three primary metrics that affect revenue (traffic, conversion rate, and average gift). This experiment produced the following results:

    0% increase in traffic
× 136.2% increase in conversion rate
× 103.5% increase in average gift
380.7% increase in revenue

Key Learnings

The more empathetic message, even if not from the primary organizational sender, can have a significant impact on the donor’s likelihood to give.


Share this research with a colleague

Our mission is to help elevate the field of fundraising by openly sharing our research and inspiring a wider community of testing and optimization. If you have found our research to be helpful, insightful, or even just interesting—please share it with a fellow fundraiser.





Get the Detailed Case Study

Get a copy of the slides that highlight the different elements of the experiment, the variables that were changed, and the key takeaways and learnings that you can apply to your own organization.


Pick your format of choice:


Experiment Documented by...

Tim Kachuriak

Tim is the Chief Innovation & Optimization Officer at NextAfter. If you have any questions about this experiment or would like additional details not discussed above, please feel free to contact them directly.