Compassion International

How shifting the value proposition to sponsors rather than children affects donations

Experiment ID: #31412

Compassion International

Experiment Summary

Timeframe: 05/20/2020 - 06/01/2020

Compassion International had traditionally focused all of their efforts on children as the object and recipient of donations. When the COVID-19 crisis hit, they launched a fundraising effort to help sponsors who were affected financially continue their sponsorship so they wouldn’t lose their child. Naturally, they placed the child as the key recipient of this fundraising effort, with the headline “Help a child keep their sponsor!”. However, the team wondered if this focus was misplaced. Since the appeal was to sponsors, they wondered if focusing on sponsors as the recipient would increase donations. Their hypothesis was that sponsors are more likely to empathize with fellow sponsors (and the child as a secondary element), rather than the child-first, sponsor second. 

They simply swapped the words child and sponsor in the headline, and launched an experiment to determine a winner. 

Research Question

How will focusing on sponsors rather than children affect donations?

Design

C: Control
T1: Treatment #1

Results

 Treatment NameConv. RateRelative DifferenceConfidence
C: Control 7.0%
T1: Treatment #1 15.4%119.2% 97.8%

This experiment has a required sample size of 110 in order to be valid. Since the experiment had a total sample size of 291, and the level of confidence is above 95% the experiment results are valid.

Flux Metrics Affected

The Flux Metrics analyze the three primary metrics that affect revenue (traffic, conversion rate, and average gift). This experiment produced the following results:

    0% increase in traffic
× 119.2% increase in conversion rate
× 0% increase in average gift

Key Learnings

The treatment, which put the sponsor first, more than doubled donations. This indicated that the appeal of helping a sponsor, in this case, might outweigh the benefit to the child, and lended credence to the hypothesis that sponsors might empathize with fellow sponsors more than the immediate needs of a child. More testing is needed on this page to continue to increase results. 


Experiment Documented by Jeff Giddens
Jeff Giddens is President of NextAfter.

Question about experiment #31412

If you have any questions about this experiment or would like additional details not discussed above, please feel free to contact them directly.