CaringBridge

How tangible donation language affects donor conversion

Experiment ID: #6436

CaringBridge

CaringBridge offers free personal, protected websites for people to easily share updates and receive support and encouragement from their community during a health journey. Every 7 minutes, a CaringBridge website is created for someone experiencing a health event.

Experiment Summary

Timeframe: 03/15/2017 - 04/06/2017

CaringBridge had done some message development around the value proposition of a donation. Donations to CaringBridge help power a platform that helps people stay connected. Their value proposition centered around this connection, as multiple tests had proven. However, they hypothesized that adding a more tangible offer for the donor into the ask might increase conversion. They calculated that it takes $30 to power a single CaringBridge site for a month, and developed a treatment of their tribute widget (which appears on the most highly-trafficked sections of their site) that called this out.

Then, they launched an A/B test to determine a winner.

Research Question

Will a tangible “handle” for giving increase donations?

Design

C: Control
T1: Treatment 1

Results

 Treatment NameConv. RateRelative DifferenceConfidence
C: Control 0.10%
T1: Treatment 1 0.13%34.3% 96.5%

This experiment has a required sample size of 76,726 in order to be valid. Since the experiment had a total sample size of 176,781, and the level of confidence is above 95% the experiment results are valid.

Flux Metrics Affected

The Flux Metrics analyze the three primary metrics that affect revenue (traffic, conversion rate, and average gift). This experiment produced the following results:

    0% increase in traffic
× 34.3% increase in conversion rate
× 0% increase in average gift

Key Learnings

The treatment, with the tangible connection to the gift amount, produced a 34.3% increase in donations. This showed that while the emotional “connection-based” language had been (and was still) effective at attracting donations, there was a segment of users who needed to better understand what their gift did—and how their choice to donate could have a “tangible” impact when the entire platform they were supporting was virtual.

This prompted more testing, specifically around how to leverage this messaging in the gift array.


Experiment Documented by Jeff Giddens
Jeff Giddens is President of NextAfter.

Question about experiment #6436

If you have any questions about this experiment or would like additional details not discussed above, please feel free to contact them directly.